Wednesday, February 28, 2007


It's sometimes amazing how politically paid scientists raise voice against global warming and thus telling how Kyoto accord needs to be fully implemented. Aside from the ideological point of view, there is a question if current Kyoto efforts mimic the environmental experiment of Karl Marx.

Kyoto accord would have had a damaging on the economy. In a matter of decades, the average income would be 30 percent less than today. On the other side, Kyoto accord ignores the potentials of job growth and its creators don't actually quite understand the economics and other cost-benefit methods of how to cure global warming. In the last year, environmental crusaders have offered very poor track on global warming. If we take a closer look at the nature of the Kyoto, then we quickly see that it was based on contradictory and selective scientific evidence, underpinning one side of global warming and tentatively neglecting the other side of climate trends. If you were in Sweden a month ago, then you'd see that there were hardly any signs of global warming as the temperature got below -20°C.

Global climate changes all the time due to natural causes and the human impact still remains impossible to distinguish from this natural cause. A decade ago, if we knew what we know about global climate then Kyoto would be completely unnecessary. Activists, Marxists, socialists of all parties and anti-globalists fanatically tell public that humanity driving on the path towards destruction as the catastrophe is looming. Neither of these arguments of fear is justified which means that they're based on a purely ideological level.

In the global field, the EU has pledged to cut the emissions of greenhouse gases and has failed to do so. Canada pledged to cut the emissions by 6 percent from 1990 to 2012. According to the statistics, the emissions are currently 35 percent above the forward target. Luckily without Kyoto accord, in the U.S. has emissions per capita have been reduced and there's a forward trend of a diminishing curve. The index value of greenhouse gas emissions per dollar in 2003 was less than 80, taking into account that the index emission level in 1990 was 100. There is, however, empirical evidence, that no nation can achieve or sustain the economic growth without the growth of emissions. According to the figures of the UN, the loss of the U.S. GDP would be as high as 1,96 percent which means that today's 1,3 trillion economy were hit by 260 billion USD every year, totaling more than 11 trillion by 2050.

What is then the passion for such features as environmental alarmists propose?

Nothing else but the redistribution of wealth and income which is equal to the re-invigoration of Karl Marx's Communist manifesto.

The Kyoto accord is similar to LOST (Law of the Sea Treaty) which would establish an international UN-corrupted agency regulating 70 percent of the earth's surface, placing seabed mining, fishing rights and deep-sea oil exploration under the control of a global bureaucracy such UN. Thanks to his wisdom, President Reagan was smart enough not to sign the treaty which would inevitably streamline the redistribution of wealth and income, the main goal of Karl Marx.

One of the greatest politicians of all time - Vaclav Klaus - recently perfectly told the truth of UN global warming report when he said that "it was the result of a group of "politicized scientists" who decided the results of the report before they began their investigation."

Global warming is an inclined full-blown myth and every serious scientist knows that very well. The leftists have popularized the question of environmentalism and blinded the scientific evidence and research about the question. Environmental change is due to naturally given causes of change. Saying that human impact has devastated the environmental diversity is either a politically supported question or the quotation marred by ideology. In fact, the greatest polluters of all times were communist plans and actions thanks to the ideas of Karl Marx.

As abovementioned, Kyoto accord would punish the advanced economies that foster innovation and growth with all various sorts of taxes and regulations. Would poor countries, mostly socialist (Marxist) dictatorships, really benefit from Kyoto? The answer is no. Kyoto accord would let them soak-up the foreign aid in the name of "development incentives". Such foolish UN efforts would inevitably lead to more corruption in those countries and would make them even poorer and structurally less reformed as their economies remained closed. What's actually the aim of foreign aid? It's the re-introduction of planning as the resources received from foreign aid are not determined on the basis of market capacity but rather on the basis of political preference.

Karl Marx once wrote that the goal of communism is to enforce a system that extracted from each according to his ability to each according to his need. Today, the nations in transit are still paying the price of Karl Marx and Communist manifesto. Now think about it. Kyoto accord says the same thing and it is thus a modern version of Marx's Communist manifesto.


Anonymous said...

I'm swedish and we are very worried about having to fire the workers in our skiing industry cause we almost didn't have any winter this season...

Rocks said...

The same here in Slovenia and probably in the rest of Europe as well. At the beginning of the season I was thinking of getting a sound skiing equipment but I rather waited for a little longer:)

In terms of global warming, "climate-change" scientists may explain this problem more closely. As far as I know, greenhouse gas emissions are not the primary reason for global warming. Natural causes are perhaps better explanation of global warming.

In terms of industrial basis, I think that industrial sector should consider those changes and thus properly restructure the industrial products. It will have to pursue it sooner or later, in case of changing market behavior of its actors. If global climate warming would become permanent, then demand effects could shift the base of industrial production towards the products that fit the preferences of consumers. In that sense, changing effects of climate conditions, are actually an opportunity for the industrial sector to take a closer look at what consumers will choose for their leisure activities and thus avoid the consequences of the "status quo". The latter means that if industrial output structure did not change, restructuring could be done on the expense of an increasing unemployment. On the other side, if workers wanted to avoid those consequences then they should consider getting better skills and professional education to insure against loosing employment and firing.

In case of Sweden, I warmly recommend you not to do the same thing as the majority of corporate industrial sector had done in 1991. It postponed the industrial restructuring, lost the majority of market as being faced by the international competition. The outcome of passive strategic policies (political influence) resulted in technological redundancies and rising unemployment. Many fitted and work-ready employees were allowed to retire because in other case, theie knowledge would not meet the standards of the competitive market. The number of retired persons has been growing significantly as well as the layout pressure on budget and consequently - public finances.

I really so no major problem in changing market conditions and consumer preferences that could be shifted from traditional winter leisure into somehow different sort of leisure to dispose their free-time. Industrial and service restructuring is an opportunity that can be met quickly in our age of new economy. It benefits everyone.

Enjoy the rest of the day.


Rocks said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Rocks said...

Of course. These are long-term probable projections. The estimation cannot be conducted without applied models of industrial output assumption and consumer preference shift. As to what we see, skiing industry in the whole world is fairly well off. Even if in Europe, the global climate dramatically changed the leisure preferences of consumers, then I'm sure that some of them would prefer to ski elsewhere in order to satisfy their leisure wants, say in North America. Colorado is a wonderful destination, especially Aspen:)


Anonymous said...

Hi !.
might , probably curious to know how one can make real money .
There is no need to invest much at first. You may begin to receive yields with as small sum of money as 20-100 dollars.

AimTrust is what you thought of all the time
AimTrust represents an offshore structure with advanced asset management technologies in production and delivery of pipes for oil and gas.

It is based in Panama with structures everywhere: In USA, Canada, Cyprus.
Do you want to become a happy investor?
That`s your choice That`s what you really need!

I`m happy and lucky, I began to get real money with the help of this company,
and I invite you to do the same. If it gets down to select a correct companion who uses your savings in a right way - that`s it!.
I take now up to 2G every day, and my first investment was 500 dollars only!
It`s easy to start , just click this link
and go! Let`s take our chance together to become rich

Anonymous said...

Good day !.
You re, I guess , perhaps very interested to know how one can reach 2000 per day of income .
There is no need to invest much at first. You may start to receive yields with as small sum of money as 20-100 dollars.

AimTrust is what you haven`t ever dreamt of such a chance to become rich
The company incorporates an offshore structure with advanced asset management technologies in production and delivery of pipes for oil and gas.

It is based in Panama with structures around the world.
Do you want to become an affluent person?
That`s your choice That`s what you desire!

I`m happy and lucky, I began to take up income with the help of this company,
and I invite you to do the same. If it gets down to select a proper partner who uses your savings in a right way - that`s the AimTrust!.
I make 2G daily, and my first deposit was 1 grand only!
It`s easy to join , just click this link
and go! Let`s take our chance together to get rid of nastiness of the life

Anonymous said...

You may probably be very interested to know how one can make real money on investments.
There is no need to invest much at first.
You may begin to get income with a sum that usually is spent
on daily food, that's 20-100 dollars.
I have been participating in one company's work for several years,
and I'm ready to let you know my secrets at my blog.

Please visit blog and send me private message to get the info.

P.S. I make 1000-2000 per daily now. [url=]Online Investment Blog[/url]